If Electronic Service to the last known electronic mail address is returned as undeliverable, or the sender otherwise learns that it was not successfully delivered, service must then be made by regular mail. Service shall be complete upon the attempted Electronic Service for purposes of the sender meeting any time period.
Service of the documents described in subdivision (a) upon an unrepresented party who has not opted in to Electronic Service or service of documents excluded from Electronic Service below shall be made by mailing them to the last known regular mail address of the party, or, if no mail address is known, by leaving them with the clerk of the court.
Electronic Service” means the electronic transmission of a pleading or document. Unless otherwise approved by the court, pleadings and other documents being transmitted electronically shall be sent or submitted as an attachment in portable document format (PDF), except that documents produced pursuant to rules 33 and 34, any record in support of summary judgment in excess of 50 pages, and the record of proceedings filed pursuant to Rules 80B or 80C are not required to be produced or transmitted in electronic format, and, in addition to being electronically served, original signed answers to interrogatories are required to be produced to the requesting party. Electronic Service shall be complete when transmitted, shall be presumed to have been received by the intended recipient, and shall have the same legal effect as the service of an original paper document.
Delivery of a copy within this rule means: handing it to the attorney or to the party; or leaving it at the office of the attorney or of the party with the person in charge thereof; or, if there is no one in charge, leaving it in a conspicuous place therein, or, if the office is closed or the person to be served has no office, leaving it at the person’s dwelling house or usual place of abode with some person of suitable age and discretion then residing therein. Service by regular mail is complete upon mailing.
Me. R. Civ. P. 5
Advisory Note – July 2018
Rule 5(a) has been amended to specify that service must be made “no later than the date on which the paper is filed with the court.”
The Court has amended Rule 5(b), together with simultaneous amendments to Rules 3, 4, 11, and 101 of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure, to:
* require parties who are represented by attorneys to serve pleadings and other papers electronically upon one another or by delivering copies pursuant to Rule 5(b)(1) following service of the summons and complaint under Rule 4;
* permit unrepresented parties to opt in to Electronic Service if they have the technology to participate; and
* provide notice to unrepresented parties of the option to participate in Electronic Service within the summons and complaint package by amending language in the summons form and by requiring service, together with the summons and complaint, of the notice regarding Electronic Service.
The requirements and procedures of Electronic Service pertain only to the service of pleadings and documents by each party upon the other parties in a court action. Electronic Service does not alter, affect or in any way relate to a party’s filing requirements with any court or clerk’s office.
The amendment to Rule 5(b) describes the procedures for complying with the requirements of Electronic Service. This amendment requires attorneys who practice in Maine courts to employ technologies necessary to accomplish Electronic Service.
The amendment defines “Electronic Service” for pleadings and documents, and specifically excludes from its requirements voluminous summary judgment records, documents produced pursuant to Rules 33 and 34, and the record of proceedings filed pursuant to Rules 80B and 80C. The Rule also clarifies that Electronic Service is complete when transmitted, that it is presumed to have been received by the intended recipient, and that pleadings and documents transmitted by Electronic Service shall have the same legal effect as service of an original paper document.
The Rule also provides that if an email is undeliverable or otherwise cannot be successfully delivered, service of a paper copy of the pleading or document must then be made by regular mail. Service shall be deemed complete (1) upon the attempted Electronic Service for the purposes of the sender meeting any time period and (2) upon mailing for the purposes of starting any time period.
All documents served electronically shall be scanned copies of the original signed papers.
Advisory Note – July 2012
Rule 5(i) addresses the service and filing of papers in civil proceedings. This amendment mandates the use of condensed transcripts copied on on both sides of the page unless otherwise ordered by the court.
Advisory Note – November 2011
This is a technical amendment to Rule 5(h) to replace the reference to former Rule 80(k) addressing post judgment motions in family matters with the reference to Rule 120, the current rule addressing such post judgment motions.
Advisory Notes – 2004
Pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 5(f), documents filed at clerks’ offices and not signed or otherwise accompanied by the requisite fee or some legally required element are sent back without a copy being retained and without being docketed. As a result, there is no accurate record of what was filed or when it was filed, but only a copy of the notice of returning the document with the date of the return notice. When it turns out a document may have been improperly sent back, or a minor inadvertence could have been corrected, there is now way to recreate what was filed and when it was filed. As a result, important rights may be lost if the documents were time sensitive due to statutes of limitations or filing deadlines.
The problem has escalated recently, particularly in domestic relations cases, due toconfusion in clerks’ offices as to what filings do or do not require fees under the Court Fees Schedule adopted in August, 2003. For example, motions to amend child support do not require fees, motions to amend other parental rights do require fees.
The amendment addresses this problem by having the clerk retain a copy of the document attempted to be filed so that some reflection of timing of the filing is preserved and some recourse is possible in case of an error in rejecting a document.
Advisory Notes – 2004
In light of current discussions of electronic filing, M.R. Civ. P. 5(k) is added to clarify that, for the present time, electronic filing with the Maine courts is not permitted. Presently, the trial courts lack the capacity to receive, record or retain electronically filed documents.
Advisory Committee’s Notes July 1, 2001
[Rule 5(b) Amendment]
The Court has amended the Maine Bar Rules and Rules 5, 11 and 89 of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure to permit attorneys to assist an otherwise unrepresented litigant on a limited basis without undertaking the full representation of the client on all issues related to the legal matter for which the attorney is engaged. By these amendments, the Court has sought to enlarge access to justice in Maine courts.
The amendment to Rule 5(b) makes clear that where an attorney has filed a limited appearance under amended Rule 11(b), service of papers upon the attorney is not required. Service is sufficient if made upon the party, despite the limited representation. The purpose of the amendment is to avoid confusion by establishing the identity of the person to be served throughout the case. The amendment places the burden upon the otherwise unrepresented litigant and the attorney filing the limited appearance to ensure that have made arrangements for served papers to be processed in a timely fashion. At the same time, two observations are appropriate. First, the amendment applies only in cases in which the limited appearance has been filed under Rule 11(b); in all other cases, the first sentence of Rule 5(b) requires service on the attorney, not the represented party. Second, even in cases in which service upon the party is permitted, the amendment is not intended to discourage the tradition of courtesy among the Maine Bar by sending to the attorney copies of served papers.
[Rule 5(d) Amendment]
M.R. Civ. P. 83(3) provides that a reference to an attorney includes the party represented by the attorney, and a reference to a party includes the party’s attorney. However, change in Rule 5 is recommended to specify that it covers parties, which include attorneys, to avoid potential for confusion by individuals representing themselves who may believe that, because of the Rule 5(d) references to “attorney,” unrepresented parties may have a lesser obligation with regard to service on other parties. The rule change clarifies the point and makes clear that parties representing themselves have the same obligation as represented parties to serve documents filed with the court on all other parties and be subject to the obligations of Rule 11 in such filings.
Advisory Committee’s Notes May 1, 2000
Rule 5(e), (f), and (g) are significantly amended, principally to accommodate the MEJIS changes directed by the November 27, 1996, September 19, 1997, May 1, 1998 and July 31, 1998 Administrative Orders.
Subdivision (h) is entirely new and references pleading summary sheets. It is taken, with modification, from the Administrative Orders and includes provisions which the Administrative Orders indicated should be included in Rules 8 and 10. The provisions indicated for Rules 8 or 10 are moved to this new Rule 5(h) so that pleading summary sheets are addressed only in one rule which addresses filing of papers, which appears to be the most appropriate place for the discussion.
The changes in subdivisions (f) and (g) are likewise intended to incorporate the MEJIS changes with language closely following those changes.
Subdivision (i) conforms to recent rules amendments to Rule 7(f) requiring materials to be filed, typed double spaced or printed on 8 1/2 x 11 paper. Additionally, the rule would require that text appear on only one side of each page.
Subdivision (g) addresses after hours and out of venue filing requirements from the Administrative Order of September 19, 1997.
Subdivision (j) is added to incorporate the substance of the FAX filing Administrative Order of November 22, 1996.
Advisory Committee’s Notes 1995
Rule 5(f) [now (i)(2)] is amended to permit the filing of miniaturized transcripts containing up to four 8 1/2 x 11 inch pages reduced to fit on a single 8 1/2 x 11-inch page. Such “travel transcripts” are commonly used by lawyers for their own purposes. They involve significant savings in cost and bulk. Allowing miniaturized transcripts to be filed in court will both eliminate the need to obtain a full-sized transcript for that purpose and ease the filing burden for the clerks’ offices. The final clause assures that reporters will not be forced to obtain the equipment necessary to produce the miniaturized transcripts. Simultaneous amendments of Rules 26(f) and 74(b) make clear that such transcripts may be used both for depositions that are to be served or filed and for the transcript on appeal.
Advisory Committee’s Notes 1985
Rule 5(d) is amended simultaneously with the addition of Rule 26(f) to make the requirement of filing all papers with the court subject to the provisions of the latter rule, which will eliminate the requirement of filing for discovery materials.
Annotations:
Rule 5(f): Persson v. Dept. of Human Servs., 2001 ME 124, 12-16.