Cross reference: See Code, Family Law Article, ยง 1-202 and the Maryland Guidelines for Practice for Court-Appointed Attorneys Representing Children in Cases Involving Child Custody or Child Access.
Comment: A court should provide for an adequate and effective attorney for a child in all cases in which an appointment is warranted, regardless of the economic status of the parties. The court should make the appointment as soon as practicable after it determines that the appointment is warranted. A court should appoint only attorneys who have agreed to serve in child custody and child access cases in the assigned role and have been trained in accordance with Guideline 4 of the Maryland Guidelines for Practice for Court-Appointed Attorneys Representing Children in Cases Involving Child Custody or Child Access. In making appointments, the court should fairly and equitably distribute cases among all qualified attorneys, taking into account the attorney’s availability and caseload. Before asking an attorney to provide representation pro bono publico to a child, the court should consider the number of other similar cases the attorney has recently accepted on a pro bono basis from the court.
Cross reference: The court should write an appointment order in plain language, understandable to non-attorneys.
Md. Fam. Law. Actions. 9-205.1
This Rule is new.
HISTORICAL NOTES
2016 Orders
The June 6, 2016, order revised the Rule by changing the title of the Rule and by making other stylistic changes.
As to the attorney’s compensation, see Guideline 6 of the Maryland Guidelines for Practice for Court-Appointed Attorneys Representing Children in Cases Involving Child Custody or Child Access.