Committee note: The court may grant leave to amend the amount sought in a demand for a money judgment after a jury verdict is returned. See Falcinelli v. Cardascia, 339 Md. 414 (1995).
Md. R. Civ. P. Cir. Ct. 2-341
This Rule is derived as follows:
Section (a) is derived in part from former Rule 320 and is in part new.
Section (b) is new and is derived in part from former Rule 320 e.
Section (c) is derived from sections a 2, 3, 4, b 1 and d 5 of former Rule 320 and former Rule 379.
Section (d) is new.
Section (e) is derived from the 2001 version of L.R. 103(6)(c) of the Rules of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.
HISTORICAL NOTES
2005 Orders
The November 8, 2005, order added section (e), related to highlighting of amendments; and amended the source note.
2007 Orders
The May 8, 2007, order rewrote sections (a) and (b); and amended the committee note and the source note. Sections (a) and (b) previously read:
“(a) Prior to 15 Days of Trial Date. A party may file an amendment to a pleading at any time prior to 15 days of a scheduled trial date. Within 15 days after service of an amendment, any other party to the action may file a motion to strike setting forth reasons why the court should not allow the amendment. If an amendment introduces new facts or varies the case in a material respect, an adverse party who wishes to contest new facts or allegations shall file a new or additional answer to the amendment within the time remaining to answer the original pleading or within 15 days after service of the amendment, whichever is later. If no new or additional answer is filed within the time allowed, the answer previously filed shall be treated as the answer to the amendment.
“(b) Within 15 Days of Trial Date and Thereafter. Within 15 days of a scheduled trial date or after trial has commenced, a party may file an amendment to a pleading only by written consent of the adverse party or by leave of court. If the amendment introduces new facts or varies the case in a material respect, the new facts or allegations shall be treated as having been denied by the adverse party. The court shall not grant a continuance or mistrial unless the ends of justice so require.
The December 4, 2007, order, in section (e), added clarifying language.