Committee note: This Rule applies predominantly to actions in which attorneys’ fees are allowed by statute. This Rule would also apply where attorneys’ fees may be awarded under common law or by a Rule, other than as set forth in Rule 2-702(b).
Committee note: If the court intends to delay the presentation of evidence on the claim for attorneys fees until after a determination of the underlying cause of action, but desires to enter one judgment that would include the denial or grant of an award of attorneys’ fees, the jury’s verdict or court findings on the underlying cause of action should be docketed, but the court must assure that no judgment is entered on the verdict or findings until the claim for attorneys’ fees is resolved.
Committee note: Where the claim for attorneys’ fees is based on law, rather than a contract, the determination of whether, in light of the verdict or findings on the underlying cause of action, an award must or should be made and, if so, the amount thereof is for the court. See Admiral Mortgage v. Cooper, 357 Md. 533, 550-53 (2000); Friolo v. Frankel, 373 Md. 501, 519 (2003); Friolo v. Frankel, 403 Md. 443, 457, n.12 (2008).
Committee note: The factors listed in subsection (f)(3) of this Rule have been approved by the Court of Appeals in statutory fee-shifting cases, where the “lodestar method is applied in determining an award. See Monmouth Meadows v. Hamilton, 416 Md. 325, 333-34 (2010). See Rule 2-704(f) for the factors to be applied in contractual fee-shifting actions.
Md. R. Civ. P. Cir. Ct. 2-703
This Rule is new.
HISTORICAL NOTES
2015 Orders
The September 17, 2015, order, corrected a reference in a Committee note.
Committee note: This Rule applies predominantly to actions in which attorneys’ fees are allowed by statute. This Rule would also apply where attorneys’ fees may be awarded under common law or by a Rule, other than as set forth in Rule 2-702(b).