Minn. Gen. R. Prac. 303.03
Family Court Rules Advisory Committee Commentary*
Minnesota Statutes, section 518.131, subdivision 8 grants a party the right to present oral testimony upon the filing of a demand either in the initial application for temporary relief or in the response thereto.
The party demanding oral testimony should provide a list of the proposed witnesses, the scope of their testimony and an estimate of the required time.
*Original Advisory Committee Comment-Not kept current.
Advisory Committee Comment-1996 Amendment
Subdivisions (a)-(d) of this rule are new. They are derived from parallel provisions in new Minn. Gen. R. Prac. 115, and are intended to make motion practice in family court matters as similar to that in other civil actions as is possible and practical given the particular needs in family court matters.
Subdivision (d) of this rule is derived from Rule 2.04 of Rules of Family Court Procedure and from Second Judicial District Rules 2.041 and 2.042.
The requirement in subsection (c) of an attempt to resolve motion disputes requires that the efforts to resolve the matter be made before the hearing, not before bringing the motion. It is permissible under the rule to bring a motion and then attempt to resolve the motion. If the motion is resolved, subsection (c) requires the parties to advise the court immediately.
Rule 303.03(a)(5) is added by amendment to be effective January 1, 1994, in order to make it clear that the stringent timing requirements of the rule need not be followed on post-trial motions. This change is made to continue the uniformity in motion practice between family court matters and general civil cases, and is patterned on the change to Minn. Gen. R. Prac. 115.01(c) made effective January 1, 1993.
Subdivision (c) of this rule is amended in 1996 to require consideration of ADR in post-decree matters. The rule specifies how ADR proceedings are commenced in post-decree matters; the procedures for court-annexed ADR in these matters is generally the same under Rule 114as for other cases.
Advisory Committee Comment-2003 Amendments
The rule is amended in 2003 to include a reference to the requirement for paying a motion filing fee. A new statute in 2003 imposes a fee for “filing a motion or response to a motion in civil, family, excluding child support, and guardianship case.” See 2003 MiNN. LAWS 1s t Spec. Sess., ch. 2, art. 2, § 2, to be codified atMiNN. STAT. § 357.021, subd. 2(4).
Advisory Committee Comment-2012 Amendments
Motion practice in family law matters is intended to mirror, where appropriate to the needs of family law issues, the procedures followed generally in civil cases in Minnesota courts. The prevailing practice in Minnesota courts is for the submission of evidence relating to motions by written submissions, with sworn testimony provided by affidavit, deposition, or other written submissions. Rule 303.03(d)(1) restates that rule. The balance of Rule 303.03(d) addresses the process to request leave to present oral testimony in the limited circumstances where it may be appropriate. Minn. Stat. § 518.131, subd. 8, provides for allowing oral testimony upon demand of a party in requests for a temporary order or restraining order.
Rule 303.03(a)(5) makes it clear that the stringent timing requirements of the rule need not be followed on post-trial motions, such as a motion for a new trial or for amended findings made shortly after the conclusion of trial. See Minn. R. Civ. P. 52 & 59. This change is made to continue the uniformity in motion practice between family court matters and general civil cases, and is patterned on Minn. Gen. R. Prac. 115.01(c). Support, spousal maintenance, and custody modification motions, often brought months or years later, are subject to the general timing rules for motions.
The requirement in subsection (c) of an attempt to resolve motion disputes requires that the efforts to resolve the matter be made before the hearing, not before bringing the motion. The rule requires the moving party to initiate settlement efforts. If the motion is resolved, subsection (c) requires the parties to advise the court immediately. Although mandated settlement efforts may create additional challenges for pro se parties, Rule 1.04 requires compliance with the rules by all parties, including pro se parties, subject to relief granted by the court to prevent a manifest injustice under rule 1.02.
The rule explicitly addresses the requirement for paying a motion filing fee. Since 2003, Minnesota law requires a fee for “filing a motion or response to a motion in civil, family, excluding child support, and guardianship cases.” See Minn. Stat. § 357.021, subd. 2(4).
.