V.R.C.P. 5
Reporter’s Notes-2020 Amendment
Rule 5(b)(4) was adopted to make the rule consistent with the 2010 version of the Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing Rules when they were adopted to implement the experimental eCabinet system of electronic filing. See Reporter’s Notes to the first 2017 Amendment to this rule. This system was implemented in civil and small claims cases in certain counties and in the Environmental Division. See Reporter’s Notes to 2020 Vermont Rules of Electronic Filing Rule 2 (list of counties, divisions, and types of cases where eCabinet is used). The eCabinet system will remain in use in those counties, divisions, and types of cases until the new case management system is rolled out in those counties and in the Environmental Division. As a result, Rule 5(b)(4) will remain in effect until that time. Once the new system has been rolled out in all places where eCabinet has been in effect, Rule 5(b)(4) will no longer apply and the 2020 Vermont Rules of Electronic Filing will govern the subject matter of this rule as specified in Rule 5(b)(5). To fully implement the transition, the language of the last sentence of Rule 5(b)(2) is moved to Rule 5(b)(4)(F) so it will not apply when eCabinet is no longer used.
New Rule 5(b)(5) provides that in units and divisions where the Court Administrator has directed that efiling commence, the 2020 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing control the method of service.
These amendments were made necessary by the method of post-commencement service that is part of the new electronic filing system and required to be used for electronic filers by 2020 V.R.E.F. 11(d)(1) unless parties agree to a different system. Under the new electronic filing system, a filer directs the system to make service on other electronic filers, and the service consists of a notice that the filing was made and directions on how to view that filing. Under the former eCabinet system, now contained in the 2010 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing, service on an electronic filer was by emailing a copy of the filing. Rule 5(b)(4)(A), (B), (C), (D), and (E) details that method of service.
Rule 5(e)(3) is amended to make clear that the time of filing an efiling is controlled by the applicable provision of the Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing and not by the civil rule. There is a distinction between the date of filing and the date of service when documents are efiled and notice of the filing is sent through the efiling system as required by 2020 V.R.E.F. 11(d). As noted in 2020 V.R.E.F. 5(c)(1), the date of filing is the date the filing is submitted to the efiling system. The date of service may be later because the system will not serve a document until it has been reviewed and accepted. See Reporter’s Notes to 2020 V.R.E.F. 11(b).
Rule 5(e)(5) is amended to make clear that the applicable version of the Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing controls whether an efiling can rejected.
Rule 5(f)(1) is amended to clarify that the filer must comply with the applicable version of the Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing. Rule 5(f)(2) is repealed as no longer necessary.
Rule 5(g) is amended to cross-reference to the Vermont Rules for Public Access to Court Records, which as recently amended, specifies how to file documents to conform to the substantive requirements.
Rule 5(h) is amended to provide that the necessity for a certificate of service with an electronic filing is controlled by 2020 V.R.E.F. 11(g) if it is applicable. Where service is by efilers using the efiling system, a certificate of service is no longer necessary under 2020 V.R.E.F. 11(g)(1).
Reporter’s Notes-2018 Amendment
Rule 5(e)(4) is added, and present Rule 5(e)(4) is redesignated (5), to provide a “prisoner’s mailbox” procedure for the filing of documents after the complaint in a civil action by an inmate confined in an institution. The provision is virtually identical to the simultaneously added V.R.C.P. 3(b) providing the procedure for inmate filing of a complaint. See Reporter’s Notes to that rule. 3. That Rule 25(a)(2)(C) of the Vermont Rules of Appellate procedure be added to read as follows (new matter underlined):
Reporter’s Notes-2017 Amendment
Rule 5(h), as added effective September 21,2015, is amended to clarify and make uniform the procedures under it. In some clerks’ offices it has been interpreted to (1) require a separate form for each item served, (2) require that the form be on a separate document from the items it identifies, and (3) allow court staff to return filings that lack a certificate, rather than accepting them and then having the judge determine how to handle the absence. The amendment makes clear that the certificate may be incorporated in the document filed or be on a separate page and may embrace multiple documents. Further, the amendments to paragraph (3) make clear that a document filed without a certificate should be accepted for filing, subject to compliance with the order of the judge concerning the filing of a proper certificate.
Reporter’s Notes-2017 Amendment
Rule 5 is amended to establish procedures for service and filing of documents under the rule by electronic means in all divisions and units of the superior court. The amended rule is incorporated by reference in V.R.A.P. 25(b), V.R.Cr.P. 49(b), V.R.F.P. 4.0(a)(2)(A), and V.R.E.C.P. 3, 4(a), and 5(a)(2). Conforming amendments will be made to V.R.P.P. 5. Service bye-mail was originally provided for in the 2006 amendments to the rules and eliminated in 2010 with the adoption of the Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing. It is anticipated that once the Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing become effective in all divisions and units, the rule will be amended again to conform to that change. As used in this rule, sending bye-mail attachment has the same meaning as service by electronic means. Under new Rule 5(b)(4)(A), documents must be sent by electronic means if required by the Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing.
New paragraph (4)(B) provides that in all other cases documents may be served by electronic means to the extent that the parties have agreed in writing. The writing must be filed with the court to make clear the terms of the agreement for purposes of filing under amended Rule 5(e). The requirement of a writing is consistent with the provisions of Federal Civil Rule 5(b)(2)(E). It is contemplated that counsel and parties may elect to file a “standing” consent with the court to receive service of documents by electronic means in all matters before the court, obviating the need for a multiplicity of additional written filings for each case. Provision for a “standing” consent for electronic service is also fully consistent with existing widespread practice among counsel to provide copies of case documents to other parties bye-mail. Unless required by the Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing, a party may withdraw, or qualify a “standing” consent to receive service of documents by electronic means by writing filed with the court as well.
The use of electronic transmission is subject to new subparagraph (C) requiring observation of confidentiality standards that may exist for documents in such matters as mental health proceedings or transactions recommended by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. New subparagraph (D) requires the use of registered e-mail addresses for service under the rule, because it is simpler and in accord with evolving practice. The current provisions for registration are found in Rule 3 of the Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing and Administrative Order No. 44. Subparagraph (E) makes clear that attorneys and parties are responsible for notifying others of changes in any e-mail address used, as required by V.R.E.F. 3(b).
Rules 5(e) and (f) are divided into numbered paragraphs for clarity. Rule 5(e)(2) is amended for conformity with new Rule 5(b)(4). In a case not governed by the Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing, documents may be filed electronically only with the court’s prior approval. New Rule 5(f)(2) makes clear that a paper served or filed electronically in compliance with this rule is a written paper or in writing for purposes of the rules. Cf. Federal Civil Rule 5(d)(3).