Ariz. R. Crim. P. 16.1
COMMENT
Rule 16.1(d). This rule does not preclude the defendant from presenting relevant issues and properly disclosed defenses to the jury, such as voluntariness, reliability of expert testimony, or identification. SeeManson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 114 (1977) (identification); Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 200-01 (1972) (identification); Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 379 (1964) (voluntariness); State v. Romero, 239 Ariz. 6, 12 ¶ 28, 365 P.3d 358, 364 (2016) (expert reliability); State v. Lehr, 201 Ariz. 509, 517 ¶ 24, 38 P.3d 1172, 1180 (2002) (expert reliability); State v. Amaya-Ruiz, 166 Ariz. 152, 168, 800 P.2d 1260, 1276 (1990) (expert reliability); State v. Dessureault, 104 Ariz. 380, 381-85, 453 P.2d 951, 952-56 (1969) (identification); A.R.S. § 13-3988(voluntariness).
HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES
Former Rule 16.1, relating to general provisions, was abrogated effective January 1, 2018.