“Do you swear (or affirm) that you will give careful attention to the proceedings, follow the court’s instructions, including the admonition, and render a verdict in accordance with the law and evidence presented to you, (so help you God)?”
If a juror affirms, the clause “so help you God” must be omitted. In justice court cases, the court should give jurors the oath prescribed by A.R.S. ยง 22-322.
Ariz. R. Crim. P. 18.6
COMMENT
Rule 18.6(d). In trials of unusual duration or involving complex issues, juror notebooks are a significant aid to juror comprehension and recall of evidence. Notebooks may contain: (1) a copy of the preliminary jury instructions; (2) jurors’ notes; (3) witnesses’ names, photographs and/or biographies; (4) copies of key documents and an index of all exhibits; (5) a glossary of technical terms; and (6) a copy of the court’s final instructions.
Rule 18.6(e). The court should instruct that any questions directed to witnesses or the court must be in writing, unsigned and given to a designated court officer. The court should further instruct that, if a juror has a question for a witness or the court, the juror should hand it to the bailiff during a recess, or if the witness is about to leave the witness stand, the juror should signal to the bailiff. The court also should instruct the jury that they are not to discuss the questions among themselves but rather each juror must decide independently any question the juror may have for a witness. If the court determines that the juror’s question calls for admissible evidence, the court–or, in the court’s discretion, counsel–should ask the question. The question may be answered by stipulation or other appropriate means, including, but not limited to, additional testimony on such terms and limitations as the court prescribes. If the court determines that the juror’s question calls for inadmissible evidence, the question must not be read or answered. If a juror’s question is rejected, the jury should be told that trial rules do not permit some questions to be asked and that the jurors should not attach any significance to the failure of having their question asked.
HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES
Former Rule 18.6, relating to preparation of jurors, was abrogated effective January 1, 2018.