Conn. Gen. Stat. ยง 54-86k
( P.A. 94-246, S. 7; P.A. 99-218, S. 9, 16; P.A. 11-51, S. 134.)
Trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied defendant’s motion to preclude DNA testing results produced by the state shortly before the trial was scheduled to begin where trial court ordered a continuance of the trial because of state’s failure to comply with statute’s timing requirements and defendant did not establish he was prejudiced by the late disclosure. 304 C. 383.
See Secs. 54-102g to 54-102l, inclusive, re DNA analysis procedures.