Committee note: This Rule does not prevent the trial court from exercising its discretion during trial to entertain any motions in limine or other preclusive motions that may have the same effect as summary judgment and lead to a motion for judgment under Md. Rule 2-519. See, e.g., Univ. of Md. Medical System Corporation, et al. v. Rebecca Marie Waldt, et al., 411 Md. 207 (2009). Such a procedure avoids confusion and potential due process deprivations associated with summary judgment motions raised orally or at trial. See Beyer v. Morgan State Univ., 369 Md. 335, 359, fn. 16 (2002); see also Hanson v. Polk County Land, Inc., 608 F.2d 129, 131 (5th Cir. 1979) (allowing oral motions for summary judgment leads to confusion with each side having a different recollection of what was contended.) Requiring a written motion also insures adequate notice to all sides.
Cross reference: Section 521 of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, 50 U.S.C. app. §§ 501et seq., imposes specific requirements that must be fulfilled before a default judgment may be entered.
Md. R. Civ. P. Cir. Ct. 2-501
This Rule is derived as follows:
Section (a) is derived from former Rule 610 a 1 and 3.
Section (b) is new.
Section (c) is derived from former Rule 610 b.
Section (d) is derived from former Rule 610 d 2.
Section (e) is new.
Section (f) is derived in part from former Rules 610 d 1 and 611 and is in part new.
Section (g) is derived from former Rule 610 d 4.
HISTORICAL NOTES
2003 Orders
The December 8, 2003, order rewrote section (a); added the committee note following section (a); rewrote section (b); inserted section (e), relating to contradictory affidavits and statements; redesignated sections (e) and (f) as sections (f) and (g), respectively; in former section (f), now section (g), in the first sentence, deleted “, on the basis of the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions, and affidavits and, if necessary, after interrogating counsel on the record, following “the court and made a stylistic change; and amended the source note. Prior to amendment, sections (a) and (b) read:
“(a) Motion. Any party may file at any time a motion for summary judgment on all or part of an action on the ground that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that the party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The motion shall be supported by affidavit if filed before the day on which the adverse party’s initial pleading or motion is filed.
“(b) Response. The response to a motion for summary judgment shall identify with particularity the material facts that are disputed. When a motion for summary judgment is supported by an affidavit or other statement under oath, an opposing party who desires to controvert any fact contained in it may not rest solely upon allegations contained in the pleadings, but shall support the response by an affidavit or other written statement under oath.
2009 Orders
The June 16, 2009, order rewrote the cross reference following section (f), which previously read:
“Cross reference: Section 200 of the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Relief Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C. Appendix, § 521, imposes specific requirements that must be fulfilled before a default judgment may be entered.
2015 Orders
The March 2, 2015, order amended this Rule to require that a motion for summary judgment be in writing; limiting the time when a motion can be filed; requiring permission of the court to file the motion after the deadline for dispositive motions specified in the scheduling order entered pursuant to Rule 2-504(b)(1)(E); revised the Committee note after section (a); and deleting the word “written in section (b).