Committee note: The failure of the separate document to include an allowance or assessment of costs does not preclude the document from constituting a final and appealable judgment. See Mattison v. Gelber, 202 Md. App. 44 (2011).
Committee note: The judgment document need not include the amount of costs but only which party or parties are to be charged with them. If the prevailing party is to be allowed costs, it will suffice to state in the document that the judgment is in favor of that party “with costs.
Unless shielding is required by law or court order, the docket entry and the date of the entry shall be available to the public through the CaseSearch feature on the Judiciary website and in accordance with Rules 16-903 and 16-904.
Md. R. Civ. P. Cir. Ct. 2-601
This Rule is derived as follows:
Section (a) is new and is derived from the 1993 version of Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
Section (b) is new.
Section (c) is new.
Section (d) is new.
HISTORICAL NOTES
2001 Orders
The November 1, 2001, order, in section (a), in the second sentence, substituted “verdict for “general verdict; and, in the third sentence, substituted “verdict for “special verdict.
2003 Orders
The November 12, 2003, order amended the source note.
2015 Orders
The March 2, 2015, order added an applicability provision in subsection (b)(1); deleted language from and added language to subsection (b)(2) to modify how a judgment is entered; added subsection (b)(3), which provides that subject to a shielding exception, a docket entry is available to the public through a search feature on the Judiciary website and in accordance with certain Rules in Title 16; and added section (d), which provides how the date of judgment is determined before and after the date of the amendment to Rule 2-601.
The December 7, 2015, order, amended the Rule to require that a judgment document include a statement of an allowance of costs, added a Committee note after section (a), and made stylistic changes.
2016 Orders
The June 6, 2016, order revised internal references in the Rule.