Annotation Law reviews. For article, “Statutes and Cases Concerning Unauthorized Practice of Law in Colorado”, see 24 Dicta 257 (1947). For note, “Standards of Discipline for Attorneys in Colorado and the Significance of the Code of Professional Responsibility”, see 50 Den. L.J. 207 (1973). Consideration of charges not made in formal complaint against an attorney constitutes a violation of the respondent’s rights to procedural due process of law. People v. Emeson, 638 P.2d 293 (Colo. 1981) (decided under former C.R.C.P. 247 ). Board’s findings that attorney engaged in dishonest conduct in collection matter contravened requirement that the grounds for discipline be set forth “clearly and with particularity.” The complaint and the issues identified for hearing did not adequately place the attorney on notice that he had violated the disciplinary rules prohibiting dishonest conduct. A proper charge of dishonesty would have identified conduct constituting violation of C.R.P.C. 4.1(a) (making a false statement of material fact or law to a third person) or 8.4(c) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, deceit, fraud, or misrepresentation); not 8.4(g) (engaging in conduct violating accepted standards of legal ethics). In re Quiat, 979 P.2d 1029 (Colo. 1999) (decided under rule in effect prior to the 1999 repeal and reenactment).