Colorado

Civil Procedure

Rule 260.4 – Accreditation

(1) This subsection (1) is repealed and replaced by C.R.C.P. 250.6(1).
(2) This subsection (2) is repealed and replaced by C.R.C.P. 250.2(8) and 250.6(2).
(3) This subsection (3) is repealed and replaced by C.R.C.P. 250.6(4).
(4) This subsection (4) is repealed and replaced by C.R.C.P. 250.1(3) and 250.6(5).
(5) This subsection (5) is repealed and replaced by C.R.C.P. 250.6(6).
(6) This subsection (6) is repealed and replaced by C.R.C.P. 250.3(2)(c) and 250.6(2).
(7) This subsection (7) is repealed and replaced by C.R.C.P. 250.6(7).
(8) This subsection (8) is repealed and replaced by C.R.C.P. 250.6(2).

C.R.C.P. 260.4

Source: Entire rule amended and adopted December 14, 2000, effective January 1, 2001; amended March 15, 2018, effective July 1, 2018.

Annotation Constitutionality. Under any of the descriptions of “rationality” used by the United States supreme court, the requirements of this rule are rational and do not violate substantive due process guarantees. Verner v. Colo., 533 F. Supp. 1109 (D. Colo. 1982), aff’d, 716 F.2d 1352 (10th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960, 104 S. Ct. 2175, 80 L. Ed. 2d 558 (1984).