Reporter’s Note 2002: Prior to the amendment, subsection (c) applied to retrials following a mistrial, retrials following an order granting a new trial, retrials following an appeal, and retrials following a collateral attack. The amendments split these various proceedings into new separate subsections. The amendments also change the rule regarding a retrial following an appeal of an order granting a new trial. Under new subsection (d), the time for retrial begins running when the appellate court returns the case to the trial court. This changes the rule applied, but not the result reached in Cherry v. State, 347 Ark. 606, 66 S.W.3d 605 (2002) (time for retrial started running when the trial court entered order granting a new trial but the period during which the new trial order was on appeal treated as an excluded period under Ark. R. Crim. P. 28.3 ). The amendments were not intended to change the rule that time for trial begins to run without demand by the defendant. Reporter’s Note 2007: Prior to the 2007 amendment, this rule provided that the time for trial began to run on the date the charge was filed, except when the defendant was held in custody or on bail prior to the filing of the charge, in which case the time for trial began to run on the date of arrest. The 2007 amendment changed the speedy trial start date to the date of arrest, whether the charge is filed before or after that date. The reference to “service of summons” applies to those cases in which the defendant is brought before the court via a summons, rather than an arrest. See Rule 6 -Issuance of Summons in Lieu of Arrest Warrant. The 2007 amendment applies to prosecutions initiated after the effective date of the amendment. If a person was charged with an offense before the effective date of the amendment, but arrested after the effective date of the amendment, the time for trial begins to run on the date the charge was filed.