V.R.C.P. 3.1
Reporter’s Notes-2020 Amendment
Rule 3.1 is amended to eliminate ambiguous, inconsistent, or obsolete language, including the time-honored but unspecific label “in forma pauperis,” and to simplify the process. Simultaneous conforming amendments are being made to V.R.A.P. 24 and V.R.P.P. 3.1.
The inclusion of the income of the applicant’s “cohabiting family members” in determining the applicant’s income is eliminated from both subdivisions (a) and (b). The phrase is ambiguous and overbroad. In the calculation of the applicant’s need for a waiver, it is not appropriate to consider the income of someone who may have no obligation to support the applicant or no stake in the outcome of the litigation. To the extent that paragraph (b)(2), covering an applicant who is not an aid recipient, requires consideration of more than the applicant’s resources, “household income” is a more specific phrase. The language in paragraph (b)(1) limiting qualifying public assistance to that constituting “a major portion of subsistence” has been eliminated because of its breadth and ambiguity and the burden of calculation that it imposes on the clerk or designee.
Because the first sentence of Rule 3.1(b) makes clear that the waiver eligibility determination is made by the clerk or designee, the remainder of the subdivision is simplified and made uniform in style, by eliminating the reference to the clerk or designee from paragraph (2) and combining that paragraph with former paragraph (3). Former paragraphs (4) and (5) are renumbered (3) and (4).
Rule 3.1(d) is amended to require the clerk to give notice to the applicant of the right to appeal the denial of an application provided by amended Rule 3.1(b)(4).