Committee note: This Rule also governs discovery in actions transferred from District Court to circuit court upon a jury trial demand made in accordance with Rule 4-301(b)(1)(B). See Rule 4-301(c).
Cross reference: For the definition of “State’s Attorney, see Rule 4-102(l).
Cross reference: For the obligations of the State’s Attorney, see State v. Williams, 392 Md. 194 (2006).
Cross reference: See Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963); Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 (1995); Giglio v. U.S., 405 U.S. 150 (1972); U.S. v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976); Thomas v. State, 372 Md. 342 (2002); Goldsmith v. State, 337 Md. 112 (1995); and Lyba v. State, 321 Md. 564 (1991).
Committee note: In addition to disclosure of a pretrial identification of a defendant by a State’s witness, in some cases, disclosure of a pretrial identification of a co-defendant by a State’s witness also may be required. See Green v. State, 456 Md. 97 (2017).
Md. Crim. Causes. 4-262
This Rule is new.
HISTORICAL NOTES
2010 Orders
The March 9, 2010, order, in subsec. (b), added the definition for provide; in subsecs. (d)(2), (e), and (f)(1), substituted “written request for “request; in subsec. (d)(2)(B), deleted “whom following “State’s witness; rewrote subsec. (i); added a new subsec. (j); redesignated former subsecs. (j) through (m) to be subsecs. (k) through (n); and, in the new subsec. (k), substituted “Discovery Material for “Material. Subsection (i) previously read:
“(i) Procedure. The discovery and inspection required or permitted by this Rule shall be completed before the hearing or trial. A request for discovery and inspection and response need not be in writing and need not be filed with the court. If a request was made before the date of the hearing or trial and the request was refused or denied, the court may grant a delay or continuance in the hearing or trial to permit the inspection or discovery.
2012 Orders
The October 4, 2012, order added language to section (m) that refers to persons named or depicted in an item sought to be discovered and made stylistic changes.
The November 1, 2012, order added a Committee note after section (a).
2013 Orders
The October 17, 2013, order, corrected an internal reference in the cross reference after section (b); rewrote section (d)(2)(B) to clarify that the State is required to provide the names of certain witnesses under certain circumstances; and adding a requirement that the State provide the telephone numbers of witnesses under certain circumstances.
2015 Orders
The December 7, 2015, order, added a new subsection (e)(2) providing for disclosure of a certain affirmative defense, added language to section (i) providing for a certain exception to the time for discovery, and made stylistic changes.
Prior Rules:
Rule 2-262, adopted April 6, 1984, eff. July 1, 1984, amended Oct. 5, 1999, eff. Oct. 5, 1999, related to discovery in District Court, rescinded April 8, 2008, eff. July 1, 2008. See, now, this rule.
2018 Orders
The October 10, 2018 order added a Committee note following subsection (d)(2)(C)(ii).