Ala. R. Crim. P. 4.3
Committee Comments as Amended to Conform to Rule as Amended Effective August 1, 1997
Rule 4.3(a) lists the options available to law enforcement officers in the case of warrantless arrests. An officer may (1) issue a citation to the person to appear at a specified time and place or at such time and place as the offender will be subsequently notified of, and release the offender (release on personal recognizance); (2) release the offender upon execution of an appearance bond (secured or unsecured) in an amount set according to the bail schedule provided in Rule 7.2 and direct the offender to appear at a specified or subsequently scheduled time and place; or (3) take the offender into custody and provide the offender an opportunity to make bail. Although release by law enforcement officers upon execution of an appearance bond is specifically authorized by the rule, law enforcement officers continue to be prohibited from accepting cash bond, pursuant to ยง 32-5-310, Ala. Code 1975.
Rule 4.3(a)(1)(iii) is based on the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103 (1975), requiring a probable cause hearing by a neutral magistrate or judge where the defendant is detained on a warrantless arrest. After the Supreme Court’s holding in Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44 (1991), this subsection was amended to require that a probable cause hearing be held within 48 hours in a warrantless arrest situation where a defendant remains in custody and to omit the provision that required that the defendant be brought before a judge or magistrate for the hearing, because the defendant’s presence was neither constitutionally nor statutorily required.
If a probable cause hearing is not held within 48 hours of arrest, the person detained must be released upon execution of an appearance bond in the minimum amount set pursuant to the Rule 7.2 bail schedule, and directed to appear at a specified time and place or at such time and place as he or she shall be subsequently notified of.
Pursuant to Rule 4.3(a) (2), probable cause hearings must also be conducted “‘without undue delay” where the defendant is released. If probable cause is found, the complaint may be given to the defendant at the defendant’s first appearance or may be delivered by personal service or by certified mail, return receipt requested. Under this procedure, many, if not most, defendants will make their first court appearance at arraignment, or perhaps even at trial if arraignment is waived. Those defendants who cannot obtain release will be entitled to an initial appearance before a disinterested judge or magistrate within 72 hours.
In the event no probable cause for the arrest is found and no complaint is issued, the court clerk or magistrate must promptly notify the offender by mail that he or she will not be required to appear in court.
A person arrested pursuant to a warrant is in a different situation. If the warrant is issued on a complaint or an indictment, there has been an ex parte probable cause determination by a judge, a magistrate, or a grand jury. The issuing judge or magistrate usually will also have set conditions of release. Even so, if the person cannot obtain his or her release, the person is entitled to go before a judge or magistrate within 72 hours after arrest for an initial appearance, unless the arrest is pursuant to a warrant issued on an indictment, in which case authority to set or to review release conditions is reserved to the circuit court. Review by the circuit court must be within seventy-two (72) hours after arrest.