Ark. R. Civ. P. 40
Reporter’s Notes to Rule 40:
1. Rule 40 deviates substantially in its wording from FRCP 40, although the intent of the rule is essentially the same as the Federal Rule. Section (a) basically follows prior Arkansas law as promulgated in Rule 4(a) of the Uniform Rules for Circuit and Chancery Courts. Thus, the method of setting cases for trial in this State will remain unchanged.
2. Section (a) recognizes the practice of giving certain types of cases precedence in the setting of cases for trial. An example of an action which has precedence under Arkansas law is an election contest. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 3-1002 (Repl. 1962).
3. FRCP 40 sets no guidelines for determining when a continuance should be granted. The federal courts have taken the position that the matter of granting or refusing to grant a continuance rests in the discretion of the trial court. McSurely v. McClellan, 426 F. 2d 664 (C.C.A. D.C, 1970); Connell v. Steel Haulers, Inc., 455 F. 2d 688 (C.C.A. 8t h, 1972). Prior Arkansas law made a continuance mandatory under superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-1401 (Repl. 1962) when a party was represented by an attorney who was in the legislature and it was in session; otherwise, the matter of continuances rested within the discretion of the trial court. Baltimore & Ohio Ry. Co. v. McGill Bros. Rice Mill, 185 Ark. 108, 46 S.W.2d 651 (1932); Wallace v. Hamilton, 238 Ark. 406, 382 S.W.2d 363 (1964). Under this rule, a continuance is never mandatory as was previously the case involving a member of the legislature. To this extent, Rule 40 changes Arkansas law.
4. Rule 40 does not require that a motion for continuance be in writing. Neither does it require that notice be afforded to opposing counsel that a continuance is sought. The court can, in its discretion, require such notice and as a practical matter notice, either orally or in writing, should be given to opposing counsel in most instances.
Addition to Reporter’s Notes, 1979 Amendment: Section (c) of Rule 40 did not appear in the original version of the Rules of Civil Procedure adopted by the Supreme Court in December 1978 but was added less than two months later. See In re Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 40, 265 Ark. 963 (1979). Thus, this provision was in place when the Rules went into effect on July 1, 1979, although the Reporter’s Notes were not modified to reflect its addition. Section (c) is virtually identical to a superseded statute, Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-1401 (Repl. 1962), as amended by Act 333 of 1979 [now see § 16-63-406 ].