The court may for good cause excuse a juror from service during trial or deliberation.
Minn. R. Civ. P. 47.04
Rule 47.02is abrogated. Under this amendment, alternate jurors are no longer part of the jury trial process. Rather than seat “alternate” jurors who will, or may, then participate in the deliberations, the rule simply does not provide for two classes of jurors. Jurors who begin the case by being sworn in as jurors continue to the discharge of the jury, unless they are excused for cause as provided for byRule 47.04.This amendment parallels the abandonment of using alternates in federal court in 1991, and is intended to resolve an ongoing source of dissatisfaction with jury service by jurors. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 47(b), Notes of Advisory Comm. – 1991 Amends., reprinted in Federal Civil Judicial Procedure and Rules 205 (West 1998).
Rule 47.04is new and is identical to Fed.R.Civ.P. 47(c). Although courts presently have the inherent power to excuse jurors even in the absence of a rule, there is no reason to have the federal rule be different from the state rule on this issue. Other than obviating confusion over whether there might be some substantive difference in intent, this amendment is not intended to change the existing practice. See Minnesota Statutes, section546.13 (1996) (codifying authority to excuse juror).