Ohio. Civ.R. 54
Proposed Staff Notes (2019 Amendment)
Division (A)
The amendment to division (A) deletes the circular reference to the final-order statute, which often could not be reconciled with how the term “judgment” is used in the civil rules or with evolving final-order jurisprudence. Not every judgment constitutes a final order, and some judgments are final under statutes other than R.C. 2505.02. The amendment now places the finality analysis squarely on the apposite statutes, where it rightly belongs.
The amendment also deletes the last sentence of the rule, which unnecessarily circumscribed the contents of a judgment. The original purpose of this language appears, at least in part, to be to distinguish between decisions (which “announce[] what the judgment will be”) and judgments (which “unequivocally order[] the relief”). See, e.g., Downard v. Gilliland, 4th Dist. Jackson No. 10CA2, 2011-Ohio-1783, ΒΆ 11, citing St. Vincent Charity Hosp. v. Mintz, 33 Ohio St.3d 121, 123, 515 N.E.2d 917 (1987). The amendment now specifies that a judgment must order or decline to order a form of relief; what a judgment includes beyond that requirement should be left in the discretion of the issuing court.
Staff Notes (July 1, 2016 Amendment)
A new division (E) is added to address awards of attorney fees. The purpose of the new division is to supersede any application of the decision in State ex rel. Citizens for Open, Responsive & Accountable Govt. v. Register, 116 Ohio St.3d 88, 2007-Ohio-5542 to an award of attorney fees under the rules by specifying that when any provision of the rules authorizes an award of attorney fees, the court may award the reasonable value of the services performed by the attorney, whether or not the party actually paid or is obligated to pay the attorney for such services. The heading of the rule is also amended to indicate that, in addition to “Judgments” and “Cost,” the rule now also addresses the separate subject of “Attorney Fees.”
Staff Note (July 1, 1996 Amendment)
Rule 54(A) Definition; Form
The amendment changed the rule’s reference from “report of a referee” to “magistrate’s decision” in division (A) in order to harmonize the rule with the language adopted in the 1995 amendments to Civ. R. 53. The amendment is technical only and no substantive change is intended.