If an attorney is a member in good standing of the State Bar of Arizona, the attorney’s practice in a federal jurisdiction or in another state may be considered for purposes of satisfying the requirements of (a)(1) and (a)(2).
Ariz. R. Crim. P. 6.8
COMMENT
Rule 6.8(a). The American Bar Association Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases (2003) and the 2008 Supplementary Guidelines for the Mitigation Function of Defense Teams in Death Penalty Cases constitute a compendium of effective capital defense representation practices. Counsel should be guided by those practices in exercising independent professional judgment. The guidelines do not, however, impose independent requirements on courts. If, for example, the guidelines recommend resources or services from a court, counsel must show a need for that resource or service based on the facts of the particular case. A deviation from the guidelines is not per se ineffective assistance of counsel. The standard for evaluating counsel’s performance continues to be that set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).
HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES
Former Rule 6.8, relating to standards for appointment and performance of counsel in capital cases, was abrogated effective January 1, 2018.