(dc) District court rule. Rule 69 applies in the district courts.
Ala. R. Civ. P. 69
Committee Comments on 1973 Adoption
The rule applies to all proceedings, whether heretofore regarded as legal or equitable, and it provides that a writ of execution shall be the normal process for enforcement of a money judgment. The procedure on execution is to be in accordance with statute. See Code of Ala., §§ 6-9-1 through 6-9-150. In this respect the rule makes no change, for by statute enforcement of equity decrees has long been analogized to execution of a judgment at law. Code 1940, Tit. 7, § 332. Thus in most circumstances execution has entirely supplanted the classical equitable method of enforcement by contempt proceedings. But the “unless” clause of the first sentence allows use of methods other than writ of execution in cases where such methods are proper and the court so orders; for example, a judgment debtor in an alimony case may be proceeded against by contempt and imprisonment. Ex parte Stephenson, 252 Ala. 316, 40 So.2d 716 (1949).
The third sentence makes the discovery procedures of Rules 26 to 37 available to the judgment creditor in aid of the judgment or execution. These procedures will be for the same purpose, but broader in their scope and simpler in their details, than the former remedies of a judgment creditor’s bill or a statutory supplementary proceeding. Code of Ala., §§ 6-6-200 through 6-6-204. The statutes cited thus will be superseded by this rule.
Committee Comments to Amendment Effective December 2, 1985
The December 2, 1985, amendment of Rule 69 is related to the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama in Green v. Harbin, Civil Action 82-C-5598NE, ___ F.Supp. ___ (N.D.Ala. 1985), in which Alabama statutory procedures for garnishments and claims for exemption were successfully attacked on federal constitutional grounds. The same issues have been raised regarding Alabama’s execution procedures in Chapman v. Harbin, CV-84-HM-5707NE. This amendment rewrote Rule 69. As rewritten, it provides a procedural framework for executions which is consistent with the mandates of the decision in Green. The amended rule is designed to insure that a judgment creditor will receive express notice of his rights of exemption. The judgment debtor may then file a claim for exemption with the sheriff, in which event he shall also file a copy thereof with the clerk of the court. This rule does not relieve the sheriff of his duty to serve the judgment debtor in the manner set out in § 6-10-26, Code of Alabama 1975. A procedure and a timetable are established for contesting a claim of exemption and for holding a hearing with respect to such a contest. Provision is made for the mandatory release of property claimed as exempt, if the judgment creditor fails to file with the sheriff a timely contest of such a claim of exemption. Finally, the amended rule follows its predecessor in making the discovery procedures of Rule 26 through 37 available to the judgment creditor in aid of judgment or execution.
Committee Comments to October 1, 1995, Amendment to Rule 69
The amendment is technical. No substantive change is intended.