C.R.S. § 14-13-209
This section is similar to former § 14-13-110 as it existed prior to 2000.
OFFICIAL COMMENT
The pleading requirements from Section 9 of the UCCJA are generally carried over into this Act. However, the information is made subject to local law on the protection of names and other identifying information in certain cases. A number of States have enacted laws relating to the protection of victims in domestic violence and child abuse cases which provide for the confidentiality of victims names, addresses, and other information. These procedures must be followed if the child-custody proceeding of the State requires their applicability. See, e.g., California Family Law Code § 3409(a). If a State does not have local law that provides for protecting names and addresses, then subsection (5) or a similar provision should be adopted. Subsection (5) is based on the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judge’s, Model Code on Domestic and Family Violence § 304(c). There are other models to choose from, in particular UIFSA § 312.
In subsection (1)(b), the term “proceedings” should be read broadly to include more than custody proceedings. Thus, if one parent was being criminally prosecuted for child abuse or custodial interference, those proceedings should be disclosed. If the child is subject to the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children, facts relating to compliance with the Compact should be disclosed in the pleading or affidavit.
Subsection (1)(b) has been added. It authorizes the court to stay the proceeding until the information required in subsection (1)(a) has been disclosed, although failure to provide the information does not deprive the court of jurisdiction to hear the case. This follows the majority of jurisdictions which held that failure to comply with the pleading requirements of the UCCJA did not deprive the court of jurisdiction to make a custody determination.