Conn. Gen. Stat. ยง 46b-124
(1969, P.A. 794, S. 3; P.A. 75-602, S. 2, 13; P.A. 76-436, S. 13, 681; P.A. 77-246, S. 11; 77-486, S. 1, 2, 5; P.A. 78-280, S. 92, 127; 78-318, S. 27; P.A. 79-456; P.A. 80-165, S. 1; P.A. 81-472, S. 82, 159; P.A. 82-140, S. 1; P.A. 93-48; P.A. 94-221, S. 15; July Sp. Sess. P.A. 94-2, S. 10; P.A. 95-225, S. 12; 95-254, S. 3; 95-261, S. 1; P.A. 96-246, S. 35; P.A. 98-70, S. 1; P.A. 99-185, S. 35, 40; P.A. 02-132, S. 22; P.A. 03-202, S. 8; P.A. 04-234, S. 2; P.A. 05-152, S. 9; P.A. 06-187, S. 75; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 07-4, S. 81; Jan. Sp. Sess. P.A. 08-1, S. 23; P.A. 08-86, S. 4; P.A. 10-32, S. 140; 10-43, S. 31; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 10-1, S. 29; P.A. 11-51, S. 15; 11-157, S. 14, 15; P.A. 12-82, S. 18; 12-133, S. 34; P.A. 14-104, S. 10; 14-173, S. 2; P.A. 16-147, S. 4; P.A. 17-99, S. 2; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 17-2, S. 147; P.A. 18-31, S. 30.)
Annotation to former section 17-57a: Cited. 33 CS 599. Annotations to present section: Cited. 195 Conn. 303; 211 Conn. 151; 214 Conn. 454. History and policy discussed; confidentiality statute cited. 216 Conn. 563. Cited. 221 C. 447; 227 C. 641; 229 Conn. 691; 235 C. 595; 237 Conn. 364. Cited. 21 CA 654; 36 Conn.App. 345. Section provides an exception to confidentiality provision for child’s parent but only until the child reaches the age of majority; while statute does not create a statutory privilege against disclosure of juvenile records for family members of child who is the subject of proceedings in juvenile matters, it is appropriate to consider the nature of the information generally contained in juvenile records to decide whether the records should remain confidential. 76 CA 730. Although protection of statute, which provides in general for confidentiality of records in delinquency proceedings and directs that any records released by court not be further disclosed, may be waived by juvenile, the record here was unclear as to whether respondent in fact had done so given certain procedural irregularities that occurred at trial regarding trial court’s appointment of guardians ad litem for the three minor children, it being unclear from the record whether those guardians had standing to object to the requested disclosure and whether they had objected to the disclosure on basis of best interests of the children or on their interpretations of statute; accordingly, case was remanded for further proceedings to determine whether respondent waived protections of statute. 88 CA 511. Cited. 36 Conn.Supp. 352; 40 CS 316; 41 Conn.Supp. 23; Id., 145; Id., 229; Id., 505; 42 Conn.Supp. 562; 43 Conn.Supp. 38; Id., 108; Id., 211; Id., 367; 44 CS 101; Id., 235; Id., 437; Id., 468; Id., 527; Id., 551. Subsec. (a): Cited. 215 C. 739. Cited. 1 Conn.App. 584; 45 CA 508. Court abused its discretion by ordering that attachment of a copy of its memorandum of decision in a termination of parental rights case be appended to any future requests by child’s foster parents for a restraining order to prevent respondent father from contacting them. 56 CA 55. Subsec. (b): With respect to private and sensitive health information, a just and rational result in reconciling highly protective state and federal statutes with disclosure provisions in Subsec. requires that statutes be read together and construed harmoniously; trial court erred by not providing respondent a full hearing re claims that his and his children’s privacy interests were being violated by disclosure of court-ordered psychological evaluation report to juvenile probation officer under Subdiv. (1)(E) and by allowing juvenile probation officer to retain copies of the evaluation report. 162 CA 811. Subsec. (d): Victim not permitted to use actual documents released by juvenile court in civil action for damages but may use information in documents to uncover admissible evidence. 45 CS 315. Subsec. (e): Extent to which court may release juvenile records to victim of a delinquent act and whether child required to be adjudicated a delinquent before victim entitled to release of information. 45 Conn.Supp. 315.