Conn. Gen. Stat. ยง 46b-231
(P.A. 86-359, S. 1, 44; 86-403, S. 113, 114, 132; P.A. 87-316, S. 7; P.A. 89-195, S. 1; 89-302, S. 5, 7; 89-360, S. 9-11, 45; P.A. 90-132; 90-189; 90-213, S. 34, 56; P.A. 91-76, S. 6, 7; 91-190, S. 8, 9; P.A. 92-226, S. 3, 28; May Sp. Sess. P.A. 92-16, S. 86, 89; P.A. 93-187, S. 5; 93-262, S. 1, 87; 93-329, S. 8; 93-396, S. 5; 93-435, S. 59, 95; P.A. 95-191, S. 1, 4; 95-310, S. 3, 9; P.A. 97-252; June 18 Sp. Sess. P.A. 97-1, S. 67, 75; June 18 Sp. Sess. P.A. 97-2, S. 108, 165; June 18 Sp. Sess. P.A. 97-7, S. 26, 36, 38; July 21 Sp. Sess. P.A. 97-1, S. 6, 8; P.A. 98-197, S. 3, 8; P.A. 99-193, S. 11, 12, 16; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 99-1, S. 38, 51; P.A. 00-231, S. 9, 10; P.A. 01-91, S. 17; P.A. 03-89, S. 5; P.A. 04-100, S. 6, 7; May Sp. Sess. P.A. 04-2, S. 10; P.A. 05-288, S. 158, 159; P.A. 06-149, S. 20 -23; P.A. 07-247, S. 61; P.A. 11-214, S. 23 -28; 11-219, S. 7, 8, 15, 16; P.A. 13-247, S. 241; P.A. 15-71, S. 89; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 15-5, S. 461; P.A. 16-13, S. 13 -15; 16-211, S. 1; May Sp. Sess. P.A. 16-3, S. 91; P.A. 17-99, S. 5; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 17-2, S. 256; P.A. 18-75, S. 6.)
Cited. 213 Conn. 373; 222 Conn. 799; 229 C. 178. Cited. 31 Conn.App. 114; 36 Conn.App. 138; 46 CA 1. Although Subsec. (q) authorizes Superior Court to intervene in a matter pending before family support magistrate, Superior Court does not have authority to vacate orders issued by family support magistrate in the absence of notice to the affected parties or an appeal filed pursuant to Subsec. (n). 103 CA 276. Trial court erred in determining that the family support magistrate division had the inherent authority to open the acknowledgment on the basis of the best interests of the child. 182 Conn.App. 22. Cited. 42 CS 126; Id., 562. Subsec. (m): Cited. 37 Conn.App. 105. Right to jury trial. 52 CA 431. Court has continuing power to enforce premajority support orders when child reaches age of majority. 45 Conn.Supp. 169. Subsec. (n): Subdiv. (2): Court declined to address defendant’s claim that section is unconstitutional; party cannot seek the relief provided in an ordinance or statute and later in the same proceeding raise the question of its constitutionality. 41 CA 803. Subdiv. (1): State’s appeal to Superior Court was premature because there was no appealable final decision since family support magistrate had not yet rendered decision on motion to open or on child’s standing to file the motion. 78 Conn.App. 848. Court was within its discretion to deny plaintiff’s motion to introduce evidence relevant only to the original child support order in 1996 when the matter before the court concerned a later period. 83 Conn.App. 398. Cited. 44 Conn.Supp. 145. Subsec. (s): Support enforcement services have statutory authority to assist defendant in seeking enforcement of support order. 286 C. 291. Subsec. (t): State has statutory authority to provide legal services to support enforcement services. 286 Conn. 291. Cited. 41 Conn.App. 803. Duties imposed by section upon Attorney General and in Sec. 17b-179 upon Commissioner of Social Services provide standing for Department of Social Services in a probate appeal. 47 CS 42.
See Sec. 52-56(d) re execution or service of capias mittimus in any precinct by state marshal of any precinct.