Conn. Gen. Stat. ยง 46b-40
(P.A. 73-373, S. 1; P.A. 74-169, S. 1, 18; P.A. 78-230, S. 18, 54; P.A. 91-19, S. 1.)
Annotations to former section 46-32: Cited. 183 C. 433. Standard for marriage dissolution of “irretrievable breakdown” is not unconstitutional as a denial of due process since language is reasonably precise and not vague, uncertain or indefinite. 35 CS 123. Annotations to present section: Constitutional even without judicial guidelines to limit discretionary fact-finding of trial courts as to irretrievable breakdown. 178 C. 254. Cited. 184 C. 307; 190 C. 269; Id., 657; 194 C. 312; 224 C. 749. Cited. 13 CA 282; 15 CA 96; 25 CA 210; 35 CA 581. Cited. 44 CS 431. Subsec. (c): Cited. 179 C. 568. Irretrievable breakdown not unconstitutionally vague within strictures of due process. 181 Conn. 225. Cited. 183 C. 512; 184 C. 558; 185 C. 156. Cited. 4 CA 611; 13 CA 632. Trial court rejected defendant’s claim that statute infringed on his religious beliefs because statute permitted plaintiff to obtain a divorce against his wishes; statute is a valid and neutral law of general applicability. 82 CA 41.
See Sec. 46b-48 re dissolution of marriage or annulment upon conviction of crime against chastity.