Conn. Gen. Stat. ยง 46b-44
(P.A. 73-373, S. 3; P.A. 74-169, S. 2, 18; P.A. 78-230, S. 20, 54; May Sp. Sess. P.A. 92-11, S. 36, 70; P.A. 18-72, S. 12.)
Annotations to former section 46-35: Jurisdiction for legal separation and divorce, under former Secs. 46-15 and 46-29, interrelationship of sections. 166 C. 476. Under section, a showing of residence by one party is, without showing of domicile, sufficient to establish jurisdiction for purposes of granting alimony or support pendente lite. 171 C. 433. Cited. 4 CA 581. Annotations to present section: Cited. 208 C. 329; 226 C. 1. Cited. 3 CA 679; 4 Conn.App. 581; 10 CA 566; 13 Conn.App. 632; 27 CA 142; 41 CA 382. Cited. 41 CS 258. Subsec. (a): Residency requirement is met where complaint for dissolution is filed while plaintiff is a resident of the state. 133 CA 250. Subsec. (c): Connecticut has subject matter jurisdiction over dissolution action brought by nonresident against Indian tribe member residing on a reservation in Connecticut. 243 C. 255. Cited. 22 CA 410; 33 CA 214. Plaintiff deemed to be domiciled in the state for the 12 months before filing the complaint where plaintiff had been continuously residing in the state for 7 years before filing the complaint and, at the time the complaint was filed, had the intent to remain in the state for at least 12 months, despite the fact that plaintiff was temporarily living in Sweden at the time she filed a motion to restore the case, which was previously withdrawn, to the regular docket. 133 Conn.App. 250.