Refusal to open a judgment of default, upon motion, may be reviewed where the question is purely one of law; 51 Conn. 391; but otherwise the motion is addressed to the sound discretion of the court. 69 C. 362. Action by court where substitute complaint improperly allowed after default. 86 Conn. 313. Formerly, did not include nonsuit; averments in complaint. 75 Conn. 317. Petition for new trial may be brought after the 4-month period has elapsed. 93 Conn. 161. Effect of judgment of default; this only further procedure permitted. 97 Conn. 123. Cited. 123 Conn. 491. Default resulting from party’s own neglect will not be opened. 138 C. 27. No abuse of discretion in denying motion when it appears defendant has no defense or has not been prevented from appearing by mistake, accident or other reasonable cause. 139 C. 532. Cited. 144 C. 389. Judgment of nonsuit for failure to appear should be opened if plaintiff can show reasonable cause. 147 Conn. 260. A motion to open judgment which stated merely that an appearance was entered as soon as defendant’s attorney received notice of the action, held not a reasonable cause for opening judgment. 148 Conn. 435. Cited. 150 C. 191, 195; 152 Conn. 699. Statement that defendant failed to secure substitute counsel because of confusion attendant upon bankruptcy proceedings did not particularly set forth the reason why defendant failed to appear; statute construed; relief under statute discretionary. 154 C. 294. Prior to 1967 amendments, last two sentences applied to written motions as well as complaints. Id., 297. Where no attempt was made to show any mistake, accident or other reasonable cause for default, there was no abuse of discretion in court’s denial of motion to reopen judgment. 156 C. 6. Since, on appeal, defendant requested no finding and none was made, he failed to show cause why his motion to open default judgment against him should have been granted or to establish error in trial court’s denial of motion. 159 C. 352, 358. Relief under statute ordinarily should not be granted if failure to comply with order of court resulted from moving party’s own negligence. Id., 427, 432. Defendant precluded from attacking a finding as unsupported by the evidence as he failed to request a transcript of the record pursuant to Sec. 51-70a. 168 C. 184. Whether proceeding under common law or statute, action of trial court in granting or refusing application to open judgment is generally within discretion of such court, and its action will not be disturbed on appeal unless trial court has clearly abused its discretion. 172 C. 520. Cited. 176 C. 579; 179 C. 290; Id., 671; 187 Conn. 509, 510; 188 Conn. 145, 151. Continuing jurisdiction under statute not affected by provisions of Sec. 49-35c(b). Id., 253. Cited. 190 C. 679; Id., 707; 193 Conn. 128. Defendant’s motion to open judgment was properly denied since a party must meet both parts of two prong test and defendant failed to allege any purported defense to the action. Id., 160. Cited. 196 Conn. 233; Id., 355; 200 C. 697; 208 C. 230; 212 C. 741; 214 C. 464; 216 C. 341; 224 Conn. 263; 225 C. 705; 231 C. 462; 234 C. 783; 236 C. 78. Trial court did not err in refusing to open default judgment in foreclosure action because evidence gave rise to a reasonable presumption of receipt of actual notice of the action by nonresident defendant. 278 Conn. 92. Cited. 1 CA 282; Id., 298; 5 CA 230; 6 CA 504; 9 CA 320; Id., 355; 10 CA 1; Id., 160; 13 Conn.App. 223; 14 CA 172; Id., 236; 15 CA 308; 18 CA 589; 19 CA 8; 22 Conn.App. 424; 27 CA 755; judgment reversed, see 225 C. 757; 28 CA 7. Section requires date of judgment not be included in time calculation. 29 CA 465. Cited. 30 CA 541; 31 CA 634; 35 CA 236; 38 CA 506; 39 CA 253; 40 CA 404; Id., 590; 42 CA 119; 43 Conn.App. 645; 44 CA 381; Id., 724; 45 CA 137; 46 CA 5; Id., 54. Trial court lacks jurisdiction to consider a motion to open judgment filed outside the 4-month period and may refuse to consider procedurally defective motions. 51 CA 1. Negligence of a party or his counsel is insufficient for purposes of statute to set aside a default judgment. 63 CA 544. It is axiomatic that the right to move to open and vacate a judgment assumes that the party who is to exercise the right be given opportunity to know that there is a judgment to open; plaintiff that demonstrated it did not receive notice of entry of nonsuit in timely manner allowed to file motion to open within 4 months of receiving notice. 68 CA 68. Negligence is not sufficient reason to open a judgment of default. 78 CA 466. Court has intrinsic power, independent of statutory provision, to vacate any judgment obtained by fraud, duress or mutual mistake. Id., 684. Misapprehension of the effect of a second reclaim is not proper grounds for opening judgment upon default. 139 CA 683. Section did not apply to open judgment of dismissal where such judgment was rendered in response to failure of plaintiff’s counsel to attend dormancy status conference. 161 CA 594. Involuntary commitment does not necessarily constitute reasonable cause for purposes of section, and trial court is not required to find reasonable cause from an involuntary commitment standing alone. 162 CA 51. Cited. 7 CS 250. Judgment of nonsuit not reopened to allow filing of substituted complaint where the action had been in court over a year previously and counsel did not see fit to plead over within the time provided by rules of court. 8 CS 372. Judgment in uncontested divorce action set aside where appearance of defendant’s counsel by accident or inadvertence was not entered. 16 CS 111. Statute refers to a final judgment and not to judgment by default. 17 CS 118. Cited. 19 CS 288. A default is not a judgment but an interlocutory order of court, the effect of which is to preclude defendant from making any further defense in the case so far as liability is concerned; a judgment upon default, on the other hand, is the final judgment in the case which is entered after the default and after a hearing in damages; a motion to set aside a default may be filed at any time before entry of judgment, may be informal in nature and may be granted for such reason as the court sees fit. 24 CS 81. Trial court’s refusal to open a default judgment because of defendant’s negligence in failing to appear was not an abuse of discretion on the record. 31 CS 540. Failure of defendants to appear on date set by court order of final assignment for trial because they relied on assistant court clerk’s advice the action had been reassigned to a later date, not “reasonable cause” for opening default judgment. Id., 549. Cited. 33 Conn.Supp. 554; Id., 775; 34 Conn.Supp. 501; Id., 559. In order not to frustrate the remedial purpose of statute, the time limit provisions must be construed as a limitation on the prejudiced party rather than as a jurisdictional barrier to the exercise of judicial power. 35 CS 581. Cited. Id., 598; 36 CS 626; 37 CS 676; 38 CS 731. Default judgment should not be opened where defendant received actual notice of the action but chose to ignore authority of the court. 45 CS 563. Failure to move to open judgment resulted in waiver of claim of discharge in bankruptcy. 2 Conn. Cir. Ct. 386. Cited. 3 Conn. Cir. Ct. 7. Mere negligence or inattention of a party is no ground for vacating a judgment on default against him. Id., 397. Where plaintiff’s motion to open judgment on default was denied, he was not precluded from petitioning for a new trial; determination of motion was not res judicata. 4 Conn. Cir. Ct. 201. Granting motion to open judgment on default abuse of discretion where facts show failure to appear and defend due to defendant’s negligence. Id., 396. Granting of motion to open judgment is interlocutory ruling, reviewable upon appeal from final judgment, and appeal was not allowed as this was not final action of circuit court. 5 Conn. Cir. Ct. 207. Cited. 6 Conn. Cir. Ct. 289. Opening judgment after default, unless based on pure error of law, lies in sound discretion of court. Id., 291.