Conn. Gen. Stat. ยง 54-125e
( P.A. 98-234, S. 3; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 99-2, S. 52; P.A. 01-84, S. 21, 26; P.A. 04-234, S. 2, 5; P.A. 05-84, S. 3; 05-288, S. 188; P.A. 07-143, S. 14; 07-217, S. 196; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 15-2, S. 20; P.A. 18-63, S. 2.)
Subsec. (a): Regardless of whether a person has been convicted of one offense or multiple offenses, legislature has used the phrase “period of special parole” to refer to that duration of time in which a person is transferred to the jurisdiction of the chairperson of the Board of Pardons and Paroles for supervision. 133 CA 140. Subsec. (c): With respect to 1999 revision, when sentencing provisions of Sec. 54-128(c) and Subsec. conflict, legislature intended the maximum statutory limit in Sec. 54-128(c) to control; defendant’s sentence of 10 years of imprisonment followed by 10 years of special parole violated Sec. 54-128(c) and was an illegal sentence because total length of terms of imprisonment and special parole combined exceeded maximum term of imprisonment authorized for sexual assault in the second degree by Sec. 53a-35a(6) and Sec. 53a-71(b). 279 C. 527. Subsec. can be given effect only to the extent that it does not conflict with Sec. 54-128(c). 292 C. 417. Legislature intended to provide trial court with authority to impose a sentence of up to 10 years of special parole for each offense for which defendant is convicted and has not expressed intention to prevent a trial court from imposing such sentences of special parole consecutively if it deems appropriate, regardless of whether such consecutive sentences impose a total effective sentence of more than 10 years of special parole. 310 C. 693. Court exceeded its authority by sentencing defendant to 16 years of special parole, beyond the 10-year maximum, where defendant had not been convicted of one of the enumerated exceptions for which a longer period of special parole may be imposed. 133 Conn.App. 140; judgment reversed, see 310 Conn. 693.